The same supreme court who refused to take the guy off ballots in 2024 by saying they can't interfere in the elections - is repeatedly interfering in the elections this year.
It's kind of genius - use the one federally-controlled element of voting to disenfranchise your opponents, doing it so late that the courts can't rule in time.
UPS, Fedex, DHL, and Amazon have the chance to do the funniest, most patriotic thing.
If we're going to claim restricting mail-in voting is an assault on democracy, it's very relevant that the great majority of countries we call democracies also do it.
Your words, posted after my democracy comment: "It's kind of genius - use the one federally-controlled element of voting to disenfranchise your opponents, doing it so late that the courts can't rule in time." - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49427947
Are you going to issue a correction to that post, that actually it's not disenfranchisement at all, that restricted mail voting is perfectly democratic, and your only objection is that the correct procedures for how the change is made are not being followed?
It's absolutely an attempt at disenfranchisement, the administration has been pretty clear about this. I asked you to also consider the other angle, it doesn't somehow invalidate the president's objective.
> the correct procedures for how the change is made are not being followed?
Tell me, what is the correct procedure for this, under the US Constitution?
It's not the Federal government's job to run elections. That's up to states. It's in the Constitution.
This is all a BS issue anyway because Trump doesn't want to lose control of Congress. It's blatantly obvious what he's doing. Nobody should fall for it.
The same supreme court who refused to take the guy off ballots in 2024 by saying they can't interfere in the elections - is repeatedly interfering in the elections this year.
It's kind of genius - use the one federally-controlled element of voting to disenfranchise your opponents, doing it so late that the courts can't rule in time.
UPS, Fedex, DHL, and Amazon have the chance to do the funniest, most patriotic thing.
this is why dropboxes at local election offices are of vital importance
(and possibly, a militia, if things get bad enough.)
Dropboxes won't help if you don't receive the ballot in the first place.
Nearly every country in the world restricts mail-in voting (context that is predictably omitted from the article [1]): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postal_voting
[1] At least from the first six paragraphs that I was able to unpaywall.
What nearly every country in the world does or does not do has absolutely no bearing on this issue in the United States.
If we're going to claim restricting mail-in voting is an assault on democracy, it's very relevant that the great majority of countries we call democracies also do it.
The great majority of countries do not announce tariffs from the office at whim and later roll them back, including many other moronic things.
Step back from the voter disenfranchisement angle and consider how it's being done.
Your words, posted after my democracy comment: "It's kind of genius - use the one federally-controlled element of voting to disenfranchise your opponents, doing it so late that the courts can't rule in time." - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49427947
Are you going to issue a correction to that post, that actually it's not disenfranchisement at all, that restricted mail voting is perfectly democratic, and your only objection is that the correct procedures for how the change is made are not being followed?
Lol, "are you going to issue a correction!?!"
It's absolutely an attempt at disenfranchisement, the administration has been pretty clear about this. I asked you to also consider the other angle, it doesn't somehow invalidate the president's objective.
> the correct procedures for how the change is made are not being followed?
Tell me, what is the correct procedure for this, under the US Constitution?
It's not the Federal government's job to run elections. That's up to states. It's in the Constitution.
This is all a BS issue anyway because Trump doesn't want to lose control of Congress. It's blatantly obvious what he's doing. Nobody should fall for it.
Alas, evil wins again. The fix is in.