The article is valid alarm but I would expect more education from "The Hill" to know that it wasn't the chatbot version of Grok, saying that makes the author sound stupid
I could see how the government’s “equivalent to 1.5 billion words or 6 million pages of text being processed by the technology” statement could be interpreted as chat.
there's a non-zero chance Grok accidentally bombs Lebanon, Oregon or Moscow, Idaho in the future
The article is valid alarm but I would expect more education from "The Hill" to know that it wasn't the chatbot version of Grok, saying that makes the author sound stupid
ok, so this comment is just _as_ stupid given there's only two AIs of note being used: image models and LLMs.
Neither of them should be trusted with decision making.
I could see how the government’s “equivalent to 1.5 billion words or 6 million pages of text being processed by the technology” statement could be interpreted as chat.
Now it makes sense why they hit a girls' school instead of an actual military compound.