Reading this, I feel that personally, I tend to be skeptical about programming talent. Rather, I didn't know that I could experiment with things like BoundCheck being free or zero initialization.
I just thought, 'Oh, I see,' and moved on. But what I don't understand is why C++ still chooses Profiles. It feels like a powerful linter in the end, but does it guarantee memory safety like Rust? I've heard about Safe C++ and that there was an actual implementation—what happened to that?
Sometimes I think about how each language has its own strengths, weaknesses, and rise and fall, and how remarkable Rust's solution is. Of course, I don't actually use Rust, but...
Reading this, I feel that personally, I tend to be skeptical about programming talent. Rather, I didn't know that I could experiment with things like BoundCheck being free or zero initialization.
I just thought, 'Oh, I see,' and moved on. But what I don't understand is why C++ still chooses Profiles. It feels like a powerful linter in the end, but does it guarantee memory safety like Rust? I've heard about Safe C++ and that there was an actual implementation—what happened to that?
Sometimes I think about how each language has its own strengths, weaknesses, and rise and fall, and how remarkable Rust's solution is. Of course, I don't actually use Rust, but...