1 points | by topham 2 hours ago ago
2 comments
Comment-driven development may be a useful design exercise, but calling it the only approach that follows engineering principles misunderstands engineering. Engineers don’t stop at documenting assumptions—they validate them.
I make out the title as The Merits Of Comment-Driven Development As Counterweight To TDD
Why did you editorialize it? I'm not sure the editorialized title is at all relevant.
Comment-driven development may be a useful design exercise, but calling it the only approach that follows engineering principles misunderstands engineering. Engineers don’t stop at documenting assumptions—they validate them.
I make out the title as The Merits Of Comment-Driven Development As Counterweight To TDD
Why did you editorialize it? I'm not sure the editorialized title is at all relevant.